NESARA, Global Accounts, Rapture, ETs; Who or What is going to save YOU?

Wouldn’t it be just grand if we didn’t need to do anything for ourselves and someone else would come along, bail us out of the mess we’ve created, make us instantly wealthy, and bring on the new age without us lifting a finger?

Now everyone who is convinced that any of this is really going to happen move to the left side of the room.   The rest of us needs to move over to the right side of the room so we can have a little conversation about reality.

As I talk about in the pages associated with this blog, I’m pretty much weird and have a different type of philosophical and political viewpoint.   Because of those two factors, plus others, I often sit back take things in and then just mull them over.   Such has been the case with all of the feel good, I don’t have to do anything solutions to the current conditions we find ourselves in.

Anyone who truly believes that ETs will come in to release us from the influence of TPTB [The Powers That Be] or some miracle act will relieve us of the ongoing exercise of survival will badly misinformed should consider a reality check.

What is it going to take to get people to readily see that nothing changes in their personal lives until they take responsibility for it and make change happen?  Just as that is the reality as to our personal lives it is also the reality in our homes, communities, states or provinces, nations and planet as a whole.

Changes happen in our relationships and homes only after we start to change the way we are.   Once we understand that it is not what the other person does that creates the problem but how we react and what we do that is at issue.   It’s not that a husband leaves his socks on the bedroom floor but how we react to the socks being on the floor of the bedroom that contributes to the problem.

If we react by getting angry and yelling about them leaving their socks lying around what do we expect but an angry confrontation in return.   We should try to look at why do we react in such an extreme manner to find out what truly is the issue that lies hidden underneath.   By changing how we perceive the events in our lives and what constitutes right and wrong reaction does our energies begin to effect others into making changes themselves.

Thus by each of us making individual changes does the social memory complex fabric begin to change in such a manner that the actions of the individuals are molded into a more cohesive harmony.  Only by changing the “moral” standards which we dictate to be acceptable behavior will we get the world to change.

“To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order; to put the family in order; we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right.”
Confucius

 

Common Law and Sovereignty-Not The Answer!

Because of my occupation I have been around the sovereignty movement for most of 30 years.  Yes it’s that old and has been around a long time.   Just like the old time snake oil salesmen, I’ve seen the sovereignty concept pitched for use for just about everything.

As for the current common law/sovereignty movement, the underlying desire and hunger for change and something better which is systemic to the current conditions we find ourselves in today is the foundation being used for personal sovereignty being pitched as the way to gain fulfillment of those desires and hunger pangs.

The problem with that is it is purely based on a lack of knowledge and the failure to be open minded enough to not see all effecting factors.  There is no such thing as personal sovereignty!  Sovereignty is supreme power or authority over something and that something is usually control or the governing of a group of people.  Truthfully we don’t and can never have supreme authority or power over these bodies we inhabit at all.  The mere fact we can’t control the health or death of it should be sufficient to make that point obvious.

Back to a more direct point, let’s begin with an overly simplified investigation of what is “common law”.  Common law is what arose in the 12th and 13th centuries as civilizations, especially the civilizations on the British Isle, came out of the “dark ages”.  The justice system that existed prior to that was a chaotic system based on feudal law over ridden by the authority of the monarchy.  Under that system each feudal estate was under the control of the local landowner who set the laws for his estate but owed allegiance to and was subject to the taxation of the crown.

As an example of how the free man faced justice, If I was to steal an apple on one estate I might be made to do sufficient extra work until I paid for that apple with the amount of work determined by the head of the feudal estate.  On another estate for the theft of an apple I might be placed in some type of confinement for 10 years.

The system of justice was riddled with inequity.  To attempt to solve the problem the English system began evolving not because of the inequity for the common people but because those of titled nobility got tired of the burdensome actions of the monarchy.

This evolving was manifested through the creation of certain documents that specified that limited the power of the monarchy and established certain rights for the nobles which bled down to the common people.

What came out of the discontent of the nobles began, as far as the legal system was concerned, with basically three different courts being established within the English system.  Laws were drawn up and put into place by a two house parliamentary system.

It was the duty of the crown to enforce the laws while the courts decided how those laws were applied.

As the courts decided, or issued rulings, on how those laws were to be applied in various circumstances those rulings then became how they were used in applying the laws to future cases.   This then is truly what is “common law” and to be more specific the common law as we know it is really something called case based law.

[Remember I said this was an overly simplified view so don’t ding too hard with the comments!]

What most people today are thinking about when they refer to “common law” is more akin to the inalienable rights that Jefferson described in the Declaration of Independence.  They are trying to say that each of us at birth have certain rights that should be sacrosanct.  They see that even that “rights” are being abused and infringed upon by those abusers of power.  They desire to regain a semblance of being in control and they look for a way to protect those rights and make them inviolable.

They have reasoned that the people have a right to do whatever necessary to seek out the way to make them inviolable.  Someone then came along and said look I have the solution and its based upon the “common law”.  But the “common law” that they seem to think exists, doesn’t and never has.

The promoters of this approach then came up with something they are calling a common law jury. The create this system for creating and running these juries but when they try to give it legitimacy through historical precedent that they go astray.

Since there has never been anything even close to what they are trying to create or remotely conceived of in any document, for them to say the power rests in common law is a fallacy and deception.

They point to the U.S. grand jury system and use a single statement by a single judge as proof.  However, if you research the case the statement was made in regards to you find it was referring to a very limited definition of a single characteristic of the grand jury system.

The grand jury that exists in the U.S. Constitution was created to correct a flaw in the English case law or common law system.  In the English system at the time of the American Revolution the representative of the English crown had the sole authority to decide who and with what crime a person was charged with.  This of course led to abuse of power by the representatives of the crown, hence, the need to limit the power of the representatives of the government.

To correct that abuse of power problem the founders of this country established a panel of peers system to decide and determine when there was cause enough for a person to be charged and tried of a crime.  The way that system is implemented has evolved through the years influenced by our three branch and checks and balances system.

To begin the process a representative of the government (Federal prosecutor) has to convince a Federal district judge that there is sufficient reason to believe that it would be in the best interest of the welfare of the people to seat a grand jury.  The prosecutor has to prove that it is in the best interest of the people to further determine whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant charging a person with a crime.

Once a judge is satisfied he will authorize the calling of jurors to make up a grand jury.  A grand jury is composed of between 16 and 23 members and most times with 2-3 alternates.  To protect the “target” of a grand jury investigation and the identity of those  testifying in case there is no indictment the work and session of a grand jury are secret.

That doesn’t mean that the “target” of a grand jury isn’t made aware of the presence of a grand jury investigating something about them as all grand juries issues a letter, called a target letter, to those that the grand jury will be focusing upon.  Those targeted by the grand jury are given the opportunity if they so choose to appear before the grand and give testimony but the government cannot compel them to testify.

A grand jury does not have unlimited time to make up their minds whether to indict or not.   A Federal grand jury is limited to 18 months plus one 6 month extension to reach agreement on an indictment or fail to indict.  To reach indictment only requires that 12 members of the 16-23 members of the grand jury reach agreement for an indictment.

The biggest problem with the grand jury system is a tendency for the grand jurors to believe that even if there really isn’t enough evidence to prove the crime that the next phrase will correct any mistakes they may make.  [Hence, the old remark that a Federal prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich for murder.]  Once a “target” is indicted they are then arrested, processed and then goes through the long period until he gets his day in court to face the determination of whether they are found to be innocent or guilty.

However, the fallacy in the notion that the grand jury’s findings are cushioned by the system is that simply having to endure the arrest and trial process usually winds up destroying the person even if they turn out to be not guilty.

What the common law/sovereignty movement is trying to do today is create some kind of pseudo-grand jury.  However, there is no grounds of legitimacy or legality for the existence of such a jury.  The minimum that would be needed for such a jury to have any power would be societal acceptance, which is sorely lacking. Without a basis to draw the power for simply existence from then the actions of the so-called common law jury becomes nothing more than kangaroo justice and vigilantism.

The more they try to “indict” people on grounds not truly supported by legal evidence but instead upon human emotion, the more they will be seen as a lunatic fringe element as bad if not worse than the ones they claim to be against.   You cannot end tyranny by using the tactics of a tyrant yourself.

They try to convince others and justify themselves by speaking to those longings, desires and characteristics which are inherit traits in all people to want to be free.   They try to justify that because there have been those who have been prone to abuse of power that the only way to correct the situation is to “take justice into your own hands”.

All this will do over time is lead to violence in some form or the other by either members of the movement itself or by the government in “protection” of those being targeted by the common law juries.

Those basic human traits at the heart of all of this can, in most cases, be defined as rights.   These would of course include the right to exist and be, the right to do as one pleases as long as what you do doesn’t infringe upon another individuals right to do as they please, and the right to do whatever one wants to make themselves happy as long as you do not infringe upon others’ right to find happiness as well.  These are the most common of those human traits to which we should be entitled to simply because we exist as a human.  These are also the inalienable rights that I spoke of earlier that Jefferson saw as so important, so fundamental, that he addressed those same rights in the Declaration of Independence.

I agree with the desire that change needs to come but disagree with the how it should come to pass.  The United States was created to be the bellwether for this planet to show how a nation can be a leader in the area of personal liberties.  However, a few men from the very beginning have tried their very greatest to usurp that power and distort it to their own use creating a delay in the achievement of our nation’s highest and best purpose.

Change will come when the people themselves have become weary of being the downtrodden.   No person can be forced to succumb to the will of another without his own willingness to allow it.

Are there times when there is a price to pay for taking such a stand? Absolutely!   Is it too high a price to pay?  Never!

The only thing that keeps one from standing strong against tyranny is fear.   Fear mostly of death and dying.  If one can overcome that fear then the battle is won.

If tomorrow morning when the sun arose 200 million Americans said, “no more will we allow our liberties to be trampled”, those who are attempting to subject us to their will could not ever create enough force to be successful.

All it will take for lasting permanent change is a leader to appear that will guide this nation toward a new beginning, a new life, a new dawn where the rights of the individual not the rights of the masses is the primary focus of this country.   A leader that will be the captain that will steer this country into an era of economic growth and prosperity.  A leader with vision and integrity.

Such people do exist!  We had such a leader to some degree in John Kennedy but he was too much too soon without the support that he needed to make him unstoppable.  Now is the time, we only need to find the person.  LET THE SEARCH BEGIN!

Asa

Who is Neil Keenan?

I’ve been sitting on the sidelines watching both the common law/sovereign movement and Neil Keenan.  Neil has bothered me every since he popped onto the scene but it seemed harmless enough in the beginning so I just let it go.

However, I’m beginning to see a side of Neil’s work that truly has the hairs on my neck standing on end.  With my gut telling me to get off the dime I did some checking.

Since I know Neil filed that global accounts case (I checked out the global accounts right away and we’ll get to that later) I started with the Federal Court system.  First thing I found was that Neil F. Keenan not only had been involved in the global accounts case in 2011 but he had also been involved in 6 other Federal civil lawsuits dating back to as early as 1986.  Of those six cases two were filed in Rhode Island and the other 4 in the Florida Southern District.

I’ll come back to those Federal cases momentarily.  The Florida/Rhode Island connection led me to search both of those states for Neil F. Keenan.  In Rhode Island I found Neil F. Keenan and Neil Keenan Associates in Newport, Rhode Island establishing Neil’s connection to Rhode Island which was confirmed by one of the Federal civil cases, more on that later.   Additionally, when I checked for Neil F. Keenan in Rhode Island I found numerous case of DUI, driving on suspended license, driving on revoked license, driving with no license, etc.   In and of itself is not all that damning except for the fact that it shows an attitude of disregard for the law.

When I did a check for Neil in Florida I got more of a surprise.  In 1983 Neil F. Keenan, date of birth 9/10/51, place of birth Rhode Island, was charged and sentenced to the Florida Department of Corrections for trafficing in cocaine, delivery of controlled substances, and cocaine possession with intent for sale or purchase.

In those Federal lawsuits, anything older than about 1996 the actual case materials is not available through the electronic access system so any information beyond filing date, closing date and what the nature of the filing is would have to be done in person at the actual court where they were filed.

The oldest Federal case was in 1986 and it was a motion to vacate sentence filing, filed in Florida Southern District-case #86-cv-00325, and may have been related to his 1983 drug conviction or it may not have been.  Either way it was an attempt to vacate or overturn a sentence that probably was issued by a Federal court.  The next newest case was in 1987, 87-cv-00922, and was a Habeas Corpus filing and can only be related to some issue whereby a court had control of Keenan.

Moving to the next newest, 93-cv-00785, the case was titled Keenan v. United States it also was a motion to vacate sentence.  What bothers me is that it is a filing against the United States for vacating a sentence implying that Keenan was sentenced at some point by the Federal system but I have not been able to locate any cases that would have resulted in him being Federally sentenced.  But because of the way the Federal Rules of Procedure are structured a motion to vacate can only be filed after you receive a sentence and for no other reason.

There were two cases in 1995, both filed in Rhode Island district. The first 95-cv-00511 was filed by Neil, plaintiff, against Carla Jo Wagenstein, Donald J. Blackburn, John R. Simpson, and the USA, defendants.   It was a civil rights violation filing.  What bothers me is that all of the defendants were all represented by someone from the US attorney’s office which means they were either all government employees or were witnesses that may have provided testimony that were being sued.  Results was a judgement in favor of the defendants in the case.

The other 1995 case, 95-cv-00557, Keenan v. U.S. Parole Commission, and was a motion to vacate sentence which was ultimately denied. Here again is a filing of a motion to vacate sentence.  Federal Rules of Procedure limits motions to vacate sentence to one attempt and placing a time limit on how long you have to file.  I think the limitation is 1 year but I’d have to check.  Since there is a single time limitation for any particular sentence, the multiple filings to vacate sentence implies that there should be multiple sentences given to Neil F. Keenan.

The last case is the interesting one.  It was filed in 1998 by Neil Keenan and Neil Keenan Associates against a slew of people and entities including Aer Lingus and British Airways.  The suit alleges that Neil got into business with some people who became greedy and decided to get Neil out of the picture so that could profit from his connections without having to give him any money.   Neil contended in the lawsuit, which was filed in Florida, that some of his partners got him arrested in the Dominican Republic by planting drugs in his hotel room.  When I read about what Neil F. Keenan got into with these guys it rings so much like basically an attempted quick money scheme in which the prime players turned on one another out of greed.

It would also seem that the people Neil F. Keenan got into business with were somewhat on the seedy side.  Doesn’t say much for business ethics unless of course the kind of business you were conducting would call for working with those types of individuals.

Last we have Neil’s filing on the global accounts in 2011.  As we all know it was filed with great fanfare in the New York Southern District.  The interesting thing is that less than a year later the suit quietly went away when Neil filed a letter of dismissal with the court.  Had Neil not filed the letter of dismissal he would have had to within days of the dismissal filing have to have been able to prove to the court that they had jurisdiction.  Problem is that the court wouldn’t have asked for that unless they were already pretty much convinced they didn’t have jurisdiction.  Considering the defendants that were named in the lawsuit, I agree, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case so failing to prove to the court that they had jurisdiction it would have been dismissed with prejudice meaning that it would not ever be able to file again.

I find it strange that the matter of jurisdiction wasn’t addressed before the case was filed.   But seeing the work Neil F. Keenan did on the civil filings where he represented himself I can understand how it could have been ignored.

Now for the global accounts.  When I first heard about Neil F. Keenan and these accounts I did some digging on that supposed gold.  Here’s the problem I have.  The official records at the Treasury and Bureau of Engraving and Printing does not show that they ever printed sufficient notes or bonds to have been used for giving to the Chinese in exchange for their gold.  Since there is no official record either they were printed off record or were printed by some other agency (CIA?).   Either way with no record of them being legitimate notes and bonds the U.S. will never acquiesce to them being real and will always say they are fakes.   Therefore, there is no way to ever convince a reputable court of jurisdiction to order the U.S. to pay up or produce gold.

If the intent was to rip off the gold from the very beginning which is what is implied by Neil F. Keenan then don’t you think that the CIA would be smart enough to bury one or more “flaws” in the printing to always be able to declare any of them that were presented for payment as being fakes?   Who would have been sharp enough to notice that the certificates given in exchange for the gold was fakes?  Now you have fake certificates and no way to prove that the gold was ever taken by the U.S. government.  Give the bad guys credit, they have been around doing these kinds of things hundreds if not thousands of years.  Anyone doing what they have done this long is not stupid.

Additionally, I have found numerous cases where these notes, bonds, supporting documentation, and even the tins they were supposedly transported in are being truly certified as fakes.  I had to laugh I found one case where the box had a flag on it with 50 stars.  Hawaii didn’t become the 50th state until 1959.  Give me a break.

If you go here: http://www.rense.com/general41/lost.htm, you will find that Rense.com did a piece on these things back in 2003 which includes a couple of news stories on them.  Further searching for things like Chinese gold treasury notes turns up lots of interesting tidbits.

As for the off ledger account book and the blue book, until someone has them authenticated using paper, ink, and binding analysis I’m not accepting them as anything more than produced documentation to help sell the idea.   You will find that the ones that have been certified fakes usually comes complete with documentation and coins that seem to prove the authenticity of the notes and bonds.  Problem is that often the coins have flaws or errors or are of a denomination or design that has never been minted.  The documentation although made to look old and appropriate always fails the testing done by the independent experts.

As for the common law/sovereign problem I’ll address that in another post.

Return of The Wisdom Teachings

Universal wisdom relating to the growth and expansion of a consciousness as it progresses through the evolution cycle toward reunifying with the infinite energy that began this universe has been presented on this planet since man first appeared.  There are references to those teachings and more specifically there are references to them being brought back to the attention of mankind at various “turning points” that occur in the cyclical changes of the planet.

Sometime back I decided to project a question to those beings who are part of my guides and guardians about the subject of the return of those teachings.   The following is the question as it was stated and the response that I received in return.

Question:

What can you tell us about the prophesies concerning the return of the ancient teachings in the Talmud of Immanuel and in the Phoenix Journals?

Reply:

The prophesies of which you refer in intent and focus are true and accurate. There will be those who as predicted in those prophesies will appear to once again bring forth the teachings.

They will again reveal and emphasize the teachings in relation and regard to the Laws of Creation. Those teachings will include those of the one you call Immanuel and many others as well and will bring to the fore even more teachings that go beyond them. They will be true to the ways of the workings of the Universe.

In these times of change, the teachings will be a sorely needed source of stability and clarity that earth humans will seek for. Each of those chosen will bring teachings to groups small and large but never in great sizes.

It will be as it always has been those that have “ears to hear” and “eyes to see” will be the flock to which the word is given. Because that which they will come to deliver will be so disruptive to the false teachings and holdings of those of the masses the messengers will be persecuted and hunted by those in power.

We are done on this issue. Is there more we can do for you at this moment?

Receiving no further inquiries, we adjourn. Salud until we once again commune with you.

Joshua

Comments Prompted by Kerry Cassidy Blog Entries

ORIGINALLY POSTED AUGUST 6, 2012.

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we has nothing before us, we were all going to heaven, we were all going the other way… Charles Dickens A Tale of Two Cities

To that quote we could also add: it was the days that tried our souls, it was the days that comforted our souls. All of this goes to the postings of Kerry Cassidy (Kerry’s postings are below this entry) and how they, in my humble opinion, should be viewed.

First if there is anyone who is reading this that is under the illusion that there are not going to be Earth changes then I suggest that you need to get with looking around you at what is happening. With the knowledge that the shift to any kind of new paradigm will not be possible without physical changes to the Earth then one must also accept that at some point the “cause” of such changes will have to become known to the population of this planet either; before, during, or after the event.

With that knowledge in hand then information such as Kerry has provided should be taken in context to what is known. Is it possible that there will be some object that comes into the solar system that will likely have an effect on the planet that might precipitate Earth changes? I would think that is as good a scenario as any.

The thing is if you are doing the inner work, learning about your emotions, clearing and releasing those that are not now serving your best and highest good, such as fear, then this information is strictly for the purpose so that you can spiritually and physically prepare for any effects that such an event might cause.

Our concerns should not be about what actual changes Terra must make but whether we are preparing ourselves for life in the higher spiritual realms. I would think that by now we all should be knowledgeable enough to know from all the sources available that to exist in the higher realms requires a different “way of being” than it does in 3D. You cannot enter into the higher realms without increasing the thought vibration levels that constitute who and what you are most of the time.

It is not like the educational system we have created in this country—you don’t get “promoted” simply by “being” and without “doing the work” sufficiently to make the grade. You don’t get “pushed” to the next higher realm expecting that somehow you’ll manage to get it right before you create havoc and chaos. You are allowed to move to the next higher realm, or higher if you can qualify, only after you have demonstrated the abilities required for existence at that realm.

So as far as Kerry’s info is concerned it should not produce fear but instead it should produce an “ah ha” that perhaps finally there is confirmation of what you know will have to be sooner or later. When it turns out to be not a confirmation then instead of being disappointed you simply see it for what it was intended to be—a push so that others might have another opportunity to stop and say “you know there must be more to this than meets the eye”.

Brother Asa
Observation about the content of Kerry’s material itself: If the object is the size of the moon and will pass 1/3 the distance to the sun (approximately 30 million miles more or less) and the moon is only about 235,000 miles from the planet on average then I would think that such an object might have little or no effect considering that the distance to the incoming object (similar in size to the moon) will be more than 100 times farther away at its closest point then we are to the moon.

KERRY’S BLOG ENTRIES

Follow Kerry’s Blog to get the latest news and updates from
Project Camelot
MILITARY EVACUATING COASTS: INCOMING OBJECT LIKELY CAUSE
Saturday, 04 August 2012 15:59
Written by Kerry Cassidy

DEVELOPING….
I have now spoken with Mike Harris’s foreign intelligence source and verified that he has a scientific background and that he is convinced that the moon-sized object is headed this way and will pass as close as 1/3 the distance from the Earth to the Sun (if I understood this correctly) sometime between August 17 and September 26th.

This recent article from NASA is only showing you the resulting affect and not the true cause which is, I am told this incoming object. I am told there have been 3 earthquakes above 6 in the last day or two and this morning we had a quake above 6 on the Argentina coast. Note: USGS has downgraded their quake magnitudes a factor of 1 in order to mislead the public. If you see a “5″ be aware this is actually equal to a “6″ on the Richter scale.

There will also likely be some corresponding volcanism resulting from this passing.
This source also verifies that we are not orbiting the sun as commonly thought but that our entire solar system is part of a helical orbit and that Einstein in fact was aware of this.
Dr. Bill Deagle has released information on the sudden evacuation of military bases along the coasts. They are saying this is in preparation for war but this is not true, according to this foreign intelligence source. The real reason for the evacuation according to this source is the incoming moon-sized object. Note: I have not been able to verify military evacuation of bases along the coast at this time…

Developing….
I am told the plates are going to move, that the area around Australia and Asia will be heavily impacted and that the West Coast can expect a tsunami 3 meters high…
For the information from Deagle go here to listen.
SOURCES, INFO & PLANS FOR WAR
Sunday, 05 August 2012 12:19
Written by Kerry Cassidy

Please be aware that my job is to report to you, the readers, what sources that I trust and/or find credible are saying to me about what is really going on behind the matrix. I will also write on this blog my pov of the information I receive and commentary on information being bandied about that I find questionable or downright wrong.

The point here is that I believe a well informed people are better able to make important decisions about themselves, their future and the futures of their loved ones.

If you don’t like what you read, sorry, but I don’t make the news I report it. I try to stay away from bogus rumors and innuendo. You will note I don’t go around for example pontificating about “impeding arrests” that haven’t happened.

Project Camelot has risked our lives countless times to get the truth out. We will continue to do so. I know the risk and I made that choice long ago and it will not change. I will get the truth out. I don’t have to like it. In fact, the truth is often less hearts and flowers than the lies. I can recommend some prominent mainstream networks if you prefer to get your news padded and twisted with disinfo.

On another subject, I am being told by a source that the Saudis are packing up quietly one by one and leaving the Olympics. Further info suggests the reason for this may be wrapped up with immediate plans for war.

This source disputes the “incoming object” as being the reason for goings on militarily in the U.S. and says it is all about rather sudden preparations for some ‘act of war’.

What may be really going on is a combination of the two. Or not.

The issue here is that our military and apparently Saudi preparations on some level are going on. How much and WHY are still being investigated.
I will report more as soon as I know it.

Just Some Thoughts About Channeling & The Future

ORIGINALLY POSTED AUGUST 9, 2012.

It is funny how things Divinely come to pass, I have been down due to health problems for about a month. During that month there has been much hubbub about channeling and its relative merits, at least within the small sphere of contact that I have.

I have to wonder if my current health related issues weren’t divinely caused to hinder me from doing much in the way of contact with my own advisors, guides and teachers as it has given me an opportunity to interpret from a different perspective. One that perhaps is a little less tainted by my own participation within channeling.

As far as I am concerned, I really don’t have any idea how others are able to so consistently be able to raise their consciousness to make proper contact as I find that physical discomfort or illness prevents me from being able to firmly contact my collective. Without that firm connection then the viability of resonance of the material received is not sufficient for me to be comfortable with it and I would never consider sharing such messages.

I have to wonder how those that do channeling on a preset basis is always able to be so perfect in their daily makeup that they can make consistent contact. It would seem to me that if I was going to do that kind of channeling it would have to be on a “as I am able to connect and bring through the message” basis and not so much on a defined period.

Without considering the issue of establishing connection, the question has now come into play as to how much can these channelings be relied upon generally. Of course that is dependent upon each individual’s ability to use discretion and discernment about the messages to begin with. It would also seem to the most casual observer that everyone should be able to recognize that they are being distorted by the wishes and desires of Terran humanity.

I know that we as a race have been programmed and educated into the belief that certain conditions are outside of our control, therefore, we have to look to some outside savior or messiah to deliver us from our bondage. That message has been taught and reinforced by our educational, entertainment, governmental and religious systems much to the detriment to the overall growth of Terran humanity.

That message, so wrongfully forced upon us, cannot be further from the truth. We have the ability to deliver our ownselves from the slavery into which we have been tricked and the reality is that there is no other way for our deliverance to come to pass. It will be through our own efforts that we create the environment where governments and those that would be our controllers realize that we are in control and not they.

It is up to us to deliver our ownselves from our oppressors and we have the ability to do it without violence through legal civil disobedience. We hold the key to that success! We control the purse strings of the very structures that are trying to dominate us; without our permission and agreement to take from us the fruits of our labors then they will have to face their imminent failure and defeat.

I know the system here in the U.S. but I am also sure that there are similar methods that can be used around the world to bring these criminals to justice. Speaking of justice, if we are to rise above the level of those who would be our oppressors we must be prepared to temper justice with mercy.

Showing love toward another who is but simply another consciousness based entity within the greater Universe does not mean that we have to accept their actions. Unconditional Love directs that I must acknowledge that they are sentient beings with the right to pursue growth in the manner in which they are attracted to do so. They have their place within the overall scheme of Creation and that must be respected. However, that Unconditional Love based upon them being another of Creation’s entities does not mean we have to accept their actions that violate the same rights of others. To follow our path toward the Light without obstruction means that we must do what we have to do to remove such impedients to that growth.

Unconditional Forgiveness simply means that I must not seek vengeance or revenge in seeking justice but simply that the punishment should be sufficient to indicate the wrongness of their acts within the harmony of the Universal All. Judgement shall not be rendered by us upon them as to the appropriateness of their being part of Creation but simply to place wrongness upon the acts they committed. For their efforts to enslave, suppress, and oppress the people of the planet Terra they must be relegated to banishment to a place where they can “live” out their lives but in a manner in which they will be able to reflect upon the many violations of free-will that they committed. It is not for us to violate their free-will, it is just and right for us to dictate that they must pursue their path in a place other than among us.

Returning to the initial subject matter, channeling is no more reliable or unreliable as we create it to be. If it is our desire and focus to look outside of our ownselves for deliverance then that is what we will find that the messages will contain. So the reality is that the contents of the messages received are simply dictated by our own mental focuses bringing evidence to the truth of “as you believe, so shall it be” and “whatever you create, you will experience”. If we believe we need a savior/messiah and give mental energy to that belief so shall we create it.

If we begin to look to ourselves for the strength to overcome then the messages will contain that which will bolster and build that strength. It is our place to bring about the conditions on this planet conducive to allow contact with civilizations far more advanced than us. Does that mean we will not be extended help and assistance? No, but it does say that before we will receive that offer we must prove our own worthiness for that assistance.

With that help will come a great responsibility to use that which will be shared with great circumflection and caution so that it is not misused and abused. We must rise up as a body to the level that the numbers of those who might once more commit the follies of those who came before us, Lemuria, Atlantis, Mu, i.e, are insufficient to establish any level of potential for such ever occurring by those of us here now.

If we as an example of humans within this great and glorious Universe cannot rise to that level then may we be left to our own devices; for I care not to bring harm or risk of harm to anyone or anything else within that great loving vibrant Universe.

A Conversation Between Two Spiritual Teachers

ORIGINALLY POSTED ON ONE OF MY OTHER BLOGS AUGUST 10, 2012!

The following is some give and take conversation between myself and Zingdad (fellow spiritual teacher located in South Africa) about the subject of truth. I post it here as part of my blog simply as I think there might be some who could gain something from the discussion such as it turned out to be. This discourse was via email and occurred during the period of August 2-4, 2012.

I came across Zingdad through a repost someone did of a message that he had put up on the internet. I was prompted to contact him and try to get his interpretation of whether we might through the misuse of the label “truth” be perhaps bringing confusion to some who would be seeking after Light.

8/2/12 – Bill “Brother Asa” Taylor

Would like thoughts about the overuse of word Truth-Truth meaning that which is found to be As Is across all realities not subject to each individual’s interpretation. Perception that which an individual finds to be in that moment of now subject to mutation–”my truth”

8/2/12 – Zingdad

Hi

Thanks for making contact and thank you for the question.

This is a HUGE subject not easily answered in a few sentences. I have addressed it in my book, The Ascension Papers, where there is a whole very long chapter called “What is Truth”.

You make an interesting contention. You talk about “Truth meaning that which is found to be As Is across all realities not subject to each individual\’s interpretation.“

Can you point me in the direction of such a truth? Can you express a thought or an idea that is always the same, always true, never subject to doubt or disbelief in all realities? A thought or idea that is not in any way, shape or form subject to interpretation?

If you have found such a thing then I’d very much like to hear it!

The single greatest truth that I have ever been able to find is “The One IS” I believe this is always true from all perspective. Yet there are many that find themselves able to doubt the simple fact of the existence of the true, infinite and eternal Source of All. So even that, the most basic truth of all does not pass the test.

Would you like to propose one such a truth that can’t be debated or doubted?

So then here is my contention: All is One and The One is infinite. Infinite means no boundaries. This means that pretty much anything anyone might call “the truth” is just their temporary experience based upon the perspective they currently hold. So there doesn’t seem to be much that is objective truth other than “The One IS”. Beyond that there is only subjective truth. A good way to express that is “my truth”. This is what, right now, seems absolutely true to me. But, if we are intellectually honest we must be willing to admit that that which is “my truth” can change. It must be able to change or else we are going to cause ourselves spiritual damage as our experiences and inputs change and we refuse to grow our truth-sets with them.

Moreover, I contend that the search for “the truth” outside of ourselves is a fools errand. There is no truth outside of ourselves. We ourselves are sparks of the divine who are answering the question “who am I really?” If that is not an exerciser in finding your truth within yourself then I don’t know what is!

I thank you for the question. I hope my thoughts are of interest and value to you. I look forward to reading your response!

With love,

Zingdad

8/2/12 – Bill “Brother Asa” Taylor

Zingdad,

Thanks for your reply and let’s see if we can perhaps have a meaningful dialog about this issue. If I have it correct your contention then is that there can be nothing in all of Creation that is immutable simply because everything can be either denied, doubted, debated or questioned by a consciousness somewhere within Creation.

Interesting premise! Let’s then begin with something primal–I am other than the body. First, from a 3D physical perspective the observable it that this correct I am not the body. Quantum physics has now agreed that what we are is consciousness and that consciousness has been through experiments shown to be non-local. If then I am not the body but instead am consciousness then would not every person who sought out whether they were the body or not find the same answer? If then that is true at this juncture of existence then it will be the same regardless of what parallel universe or level of existence one would find themselves in as it takes consciousness to bring form to a bodily housing.

That can be debated, doubted, denied, or questioned but the fact will ever remain that you are not the body and instead you are consciousness. Such is an immutable fact or truth that will found to be so in the end. During the search for that truth you will encounter many perspectives surrounding the accumulation of knowledge until one reaches the point through observation there is no other alternative but for it to be as found to be. That is truth and will remain to be so throughout all of Creation as the foundation upon which Creation is formed is consciousness.

By the way thoughts and ideas are not the basis upon which truth is formed. Truth is formed based upon laws that operate underlying all that one perceives to be within Creation. The primary law is that all of Creation is mental or consciousness, if your will. The reason why I choose the subject to start this discussion with is that you are not your body and since I noted you were teach/learning about ascension that is one of the elementals upon which the process of ascension is based. Since all of Creation is consciousness or mental then you cannot be the body simply because you are Creation and Creation is consciousness.

You can debate, doubt, argue, question as much as you like but the statement that you are Creation is always a truth. In the end everyone will arrive at the same point that they KNOW they are Creation and Creation are they. It is the achievement of the knowing at the depth that cannot be defined that will constitute it to be a real truth.

The contention here is that Terran humanity uses the term truth not so much as it should be used but more in a generality of “close counts”. However, if one is to function in harmony with THE ALL then perhaps “close counts” isn’t good enough. If one is to co-create and manifest that which is truly desired then “close counts” is surely not good enough. To co-create one must come to a knowledge of what is truth and how do I know when I have discovered it; that then is the inner work that has to be done.

Truth in the Universal sense exists throughout Creation. What you describe as going inward to discover truth is more of the learn/teaching that is required to bring oneself to the point that you can become the observer of the observed sufficiently to be able to recognize truth when you find it. It is not that truth is found within; it is simply that recognition of truth can only occur within, not without.

You see when I speak of TRUTH, I truly mean TRUTH–that which is the fundamental underlying structure that constitutes Creation. The elements that makes up Creation and existence will not be found to be different by you and different by me for if it was found to be different then we would not be existing within the same Creation.

I hope that you will find my expression useful.

Brother Asa

8/2/12 – Zingdad

Hi Bill

Yes, I would certainly prefer a meaningful dialogue to a meaningless one! 🙂

Bill, if you don’t mind, before proceeding one step further, I would like to see where our common ground is. Discussing and debating without common ground is like wrestling in quick-sand.

Here is what is absolutely irreducibly true for me: The one truth, the one thing that is ALWAYS true, even when it is hidden behind many layers of illusion, is…

“All is ONE”

Can you agree with that?

If you can then we have a starting point. If not then I will have the choice to either 1. try to convince you of this or 2. abandon this discussion. It is my policy never to try to convince someone of anything so… 🙂

If you DO agree with me then do you agree that it is intuitively obvious that The One is truly INFINITE?

This point, as far as I am concerned is not debatable as it follows as night follows day from the statement All is ONE. But, if you agree with that first statement and are not sure of this second statement then I will be willing to share a discussion on this point to see if we can find commonality on it as well. If we cannot then I will have the choice to either 1. try to convince you of this or 2. abandon this discussion. But we’ve already been over this material so… 🙂

So, Bill, please be so kind as to humour me and let me know if you are with me on or not on these two statements:

All is ONE

The One is truly infinite

If you are, then I will have a clear idea of how to proceed with a response to your email.

With love

8/3/12 – Bill “Brother Asa” Taylor

Zingdad,

As I stated before a truth is immutable. Let’s approach it from this direction the One must be infinite for if it was not infinite it would be many or simply more than One. Since the All is One and One is infinite then All is One which also a carries forward into the All is infinite. Some what circular in statement but the underlying knowing clarifies the circularity. These are primal truths and it cannot be other than it is.

BTW, Asa is my given middle name, so either is fine. From the time I entered school until I went in the service everyone other than my family called me Asa, after going into the service it became common for me to be called Bill, short for William.

8/4/12 – Zingdad

Hi Asa

That was eloquently stated… and I agree completely.

I guess it is possible for someone to doubt that there is, beyond this realm of seeming separation, a great unifying Oneness. But I see that we very clearly have the common ground I was hoping for in this regard.

I agree furthermore that THIS is an immutable truth: “All is One”. As much as that is immutable it also, to me, irrefutably implies certain things. The first of those is that the All is infinite, as I am most pleased that you agree.

It also implies that all “parts” of the one are only illusorily apart from each other. Because, of course, there could not truly be separate bits if All is One. So the separations, divisions, boundaries and finite ends of any and all within The One are illusory. They SEEM to be so but they are not really so. For some time they appear to be real and true but they are, ultimately, found to be just experiences that we can have when we hold a certain perspective.

I’m sure you are still in agreement with me thus far?

And here comes my point about The Truth: that if we agree that The One is infinite then we must also agree that there can be no other ultimate rules or truth BUT that one. The ONLY truth can be is that The One IS. Because, you see any other TRUTH will come into conflict with that prime truth. Infinity brooks no boundaries. If there are boundaries then it is not infinite. A truth not only defines something but it also limits it. It says “this thing is THAT and it is never THIS”. Which is logically incompatible with anything that is infinite… no boundaries, no limits, no definitions… therefore no unchangeable defining truths.

Now you and I CAN experience limitations. That is the principal upon which a reality is composed. Reality. Real-ity. A place where this-and-that seems real. Not IS real… but seems real. Such as the separation that we experience in THIS reality. It seems SO real! But it isn’t. It’s just an illusion. In a similar fashion there are other realities that have been created within the infinite field of The Oneness that have other basic founding precepts (other temporary and illusory foundational limitations). They are each, in their own way, useful and entertaining for Us to experience and explore. But they are not TRUE. Not in the way you demand Truth to be. Because, although while We are within them, We do experience them to be real… when we leave these realities we realize it was just a temporary creation. Their rules and laws (truths) were just figments of Our creative imaginations.

So we can experience a limitation on infinity. But only as an illusion. Only as a transitory creation. Not as an eternally immutable fact.

The ONLY eternally immutable fact that I recognize is:

“The One IS”

Everything else is is a matter of creation that can be re-created differently or upon which We can take a different perspective. Everything else is an imbalance in the eternal field of the Oneness and is balanced out and cancelled out elsewhere else (“true” over here… not true over there).

So, if you are demanding only the most rigorous usage of the word “truth”, then there is but one truth I recognize:

“The One IS”

HOWEVER. I myself seem to be real. I really, really, really do! If I investigate this in every way possible to me then I can find no breach to the evidence that I seem to be real. This SEEMS true to me. So, for as long as I am me, then I have a truth about myself: I am real. I exist. This truth, it seems to me is a pretty high-order one. I really, really, really believe it. But it does seem to me that at SOME point somewhere, the “I” that I am imagining myself to be might return to The Oneness. So the “truth” that “I exist” seems to be a very little bit less true than “The One IS”.

So it seems to me that “The One IS” is the ultimate truth and “I exist” is MY truth. And so a distinction springs up.

Now I have no such truth about you though! My dear Asa, as interesting and fun as it might be for me to engage with you by writing all these little text characters on the screen, it is entirely possible for me to doubt your very existence. There is SOME evidence that you exist and that you are real. But last night I had a series of very real-seeming interactions with dream-characters and then I woke up and decided they were in fact NOT real. So… it is entirely possible that I am engaged in some much higher-level dream right now. It is entirely possible that you, and this conversation, are a figment of my imagination. So I do not have a truth about your existence. But it would not be useful for me to engage with you (or any other being for that matter) with the basic premise that you don’t exist! So I choose to concede that, in all probability, you are also another mote of The One who is also experiencing your own existence. I choose to accept that you have your own truth that is different from mine:

That YOU exist.

And so I allow for a second distinction. I accept that probably you have YOUR truth that is different from MY truth but that, ultimately, both of these are subordinate to the one TRUTH.

Now this is just the very simplest and most basic illustration of the concept but no matter how hard I try nor how deeply I delve I seem to come up with the same thing: there is just this one universal truth and then there are an infinite number of things that seem to be true from one perspective or another.

Allow me to further illustrate using your proposed truth that we are all ultimately CONSCIOUSNESS. You say this is the TRUTH – the eternally immutable kind. Okay. I say this is Truth of the transitory kind. What I mean is that I too have come to this very conclusion: that I am not my body (obviously) and also that what I am is actually immortal. So I like that conclusion. It seems to me that I am consciousness. You and I agree on that. But is it an immutable truth?

Let’s see, shall we? You proffer Quantum Mechanics as evidence. Okay. The problem there is that the theoretical physicists who are the ones actually producing the quantum mechanics theories… are atheists. Pretty much all of them. They understand the meaning of words such as “observer” differently from what you and I do. I don’t reeeeealy get their contention. Really I don’t. It seems to me that the result of their experiments MUST be pointing to the primacy of consciousness. My own spirit guide tells me that their science will continue to stumble in the dark indeed UNTIL they do recognize consciousness as a fundamental principle in the Universe. So you and I ARE on the same page here. But the point must stand that we are looking from a distance and coming up with conclusions that those who are actually DOING this science are not. So it doesn’t seem as if QM is as clearly pointing to the primacy of consciousness as all that.

And then… here is a little thought experiment for you. What if you and I met “on the other side” and discovered ourselves to be, as we had expected, to be beings of pure consciousness. Wonderful! Right? But then we meet someone who is much further advanced than we, the newly awakened “pure consciousness” beings that we now are, who tells us that there is a higher state of existence yet. We can, if we choose, let go of this attachment to consciousness and awaken to this even higher state. Avid searchers after growth and awakening that we are, we leap at it and we do this. We then discover that at this higher state we are much, much more than mere consciousness. We are something else entirely. Something, in some way that I now can’t imagine, truly limitless and sublime. We discover that “consciousness” is just the vehicle that we used for ourselves while playing WITHIN the separation reality we were previously in.

What then?

Is CONSCIOUSNESS still an ultimate truth? Or is it just that, from the perspective of those inside this separation-reality, that it might appear to be so as we awaken?

I know this is just a thought experiment. I know I can’t “prove” any of this to you. But that is exactly the point. If I dig hard enough then EVERYTHING turns out to be like this. EVERYTHING turns out to be just another story, just another set of thoughts and ideas. Nothing seems to have the kind of eternal validity that you are demanding the word TRUTH must imply. Nothing, that is, except The One IS.

Not from where I stand.

And that, my friend, is MY truth. It is for now. Because MY truth changes and grows as I do. Because I come to decide that truth IS mutable. It is the scaffolding upon which I build my own very being. And my inner being-building exercises are very energetic! 🙂 So I need scaffolding that can handle the changes without getting brittle and snapping. It updates as I learn new things and it morphs as I release old items that no longer serve me. So my truth-set changes. And as it changes so my experience of life changes. Because what is outside of me is nothing other than a mirror of what is inside of me. I don’t need to heal the world… I only need to heal my own beliefs. Which is my truth-set.

But I do not insist that YOUR truth should in any way support or match mine. So I accept completely that you might balk at all this “my truth” and “your truth” stuff. If that is wrong for you then that is okay. I do not need you to agree with me or to believe what I do or… anything. I don’t write to you to convince you. I write to you only because you asked and I see in you “another me”. It is my joy to engage you in conversation. It is my joy to share with you MY truth… even if you don’t like me calling it that.

With love,

Zingdad

8/4/12 – Bill “Brother Asa” Taylor

Zingdad,

I do appreciate that you are taking the time to indulge in these conversations with me. There are those of us who are striving to daily exist at these levels but we are spread out around the world making it difficult to have conversations such as this. From a personal perspective it is through conversations such as this, entered into with an open mind, that helps keep me from becoming trapped in a box of my own making.

For the casual observer what we may appear to be discussing would lie more into the arena of semantics—whether what we are doing is discussing whether the correct use would be to use the term “truth-sets” or “perceptions” but it is much greater than that. It is how we perceive and find where we are within the ALL.

We both agree that within the ALL there is a TRUTH—“ALL IS ONE”. If I have it right, originating from your precept of operating from truth-sets then one would have to allow that within the ALL there has to be the provision for the existence of everything. We have already agreed that ALL IS ONE is a truth, therefore, the existence for truth to exist within the ALL has been established. That truth would have to be, as expected as part of the ALL, infinite so as it would be found to be as truth everywhere within the ALL.

Having embraced that ALL IS ONE is infinite, therefore, it has to contain infiniteness then truth must be infinite as well since without truth being infinite ALL IS ONE being truth would not be infinite. That would seem to fulfill your position that there are infinite sets of truth. However, we also agreed that Truth was immutable since ALL IS ONE is immutable truth. There then seems to be a conundrum, a mystery, how can Truth be immutable and infinite at the same time?

To be honest I do not know! I can offer a different perspective that for me helps to alleviate the conundrum and that is that what we in this existence defined as “truth” is not truth as much as it is perception based on limited knowledge of ALL IS ONE. From that arises that since Truth exists within ALL IS ONE that is immutable then allowing for the existence of infinite within ALL IS ONE there has to be immutable truths.

The question then becomes how do I prepare myself to recognize these immutable truths when I encounter them? Say for instance would the Universal Law of Love be an immutable truth—Love is the greatest thing in ALL IS ONE and ALL IS ONE is Love or is it as you perceive it to be simply a truth-set with mutability? What then of the Universal Law of Polarity–within the ALL IS ONE opposites exist with infinite varying degrees between them? There is Light (knowledge) and Dark (lack of knowledge) with infinite varying degrees between. Which says that One, Prime Creator, Infinite Mind, Source of All That Is exists at one polarity and something exists at the other. If that is the law and that is as it will be found to be, is that not a truth and would it not be found to be that truth across all realities, dimensions, Universes, and whatever within the ALL IS ONE that we find ourselves?

The same would apply to the Law of One—we are All One, we are All part of one Energy, we are All of One Mind, we are ALL from One Source, The Infinite Mind, The Prime Creator, The Source of All That Is, That Which Was Not Manifested—would it not? Meaning is it not an immutable truth to be found and recognized as such. My question then goes to the heart of the search, is not what we are seeking is those very truths to become once more an integrated part of us? If so, then what I must do is prepare to be able to know when such truths have been found and not to dilute the intent of the search by obscuring what it is I seek.

Now we are to the heart of the matter. I ask that, if you would be so gracious, to help decipher whether these which I refer to as Laws are as they would appear to be, simply immutable truths, or are they merely illusory and there is no rhyme or reason to ALL IS ONE.

Much Love,

Asa

I posted this to Zingdad on 8/4/12 and I have received no reply. Should a reply subsequently come in then I will post it as an additional to my blog.

Truth and Belief

This essay on TRUTH is prompted by something that I read in another persons blog. It is a blog that belongs to a very nice lady. In the particular post in question she was admonishing others about comments they had posted.

The admonishments she was dishing out truly can only be called in my opinion, I readily admit it is my opinion, criticism based upon her judging of others. During her discourse of passing her judgment, on those who had posted comments she found not to her liking, she made the statement; “These words of mine right now may not sit well with you, but I’m speaking my truth…”.

When I speak on the subject of truth and belief I usually like to begin the talk with the admonition that a person should steer carefully when dealing with truth as you can easily get caught by the rut in truth; and, you must be very careful about what beliefs you have because within every belief is a lie. I’m usually drawn into talking about this subject when I hear someone use the idiotic phrase “my truth is different than your truth” or some such nonsense.

The reality truly is that we throw the term truth around very casually without regard to how we use it. What we try to call truth has so many definitions that it is virtually impossible to truly know what truth really is. Most people have no notion of what is their perception of something and what is really a truth.

Truth, as it is so loosely used, is defined as the quality of being true, or that something is genuine, or it is something actual or factual. So which one is it? Is it the quality of being true, or the quality of being genuine, or is it being either the quality of being actual or factual? We also define it sometimes as truth being the state of being the case. Then at other times we define it as the body of real things, events and facts.

A judgment, proposition, or idea that is true or accepted as true can also by defintion be truth. Now that’s a winner, isn’t it? All it takes is for something to be accepted as true and it will be truth. So if the guy on the boob tube repeats something often enough and long enough the sheeple accept it as truth then that will make it truth. Some how, I don’t think so!

Above all else truth can be defined as a transcendent fundamental or spiritual reality and that’s the definition I want to talk about in regards to TRUTH. A transcendent fundamental is a basic reality that exists beyond or above the range of normal or merely physical human experience. Truth then is something that is experienced or known to be that is beyond our normal range of human experience. That then makes this kind of TRUTH the only REAL TRUTH that there is.

TRUTH is something that will be found to be the same throughout this Universe and on every level and at all vibrational existences. These are often called Universal Principles or Laws. Much like the physical “Laws of Nature” these Universal Principles or Laws define the way the Universe is structured and functions.

A basic fundamental principle or truth is that there IS only ONE. Because there is only ONE, which I call Creator or the Un-Manifested, then we each have to be simply a fragment, individualization, or small iota of that ONE. Creator or the Un-Manifested is what existed prior to the existence of everything else and is the basic fundamental “stuff” from which everything else has to be made.

A fact or actuality then of this magnitude then will be true on any planet within this Universe existing in any density on any vibrational realm. That is what it takes to be TRUTH.

What we conceive of here as being truth is not truth but merely our preception shaded, or obscured to be more exact, by our lack of knowledge. As I stated earlier this essay on TRUTH began when there was a posting on a blog where the writer made the statement “These words of mine right now may not sit well with you, but I’m speaking my truth…”.

But what she was really doing was simply stating her beliefs and perceptions based on her observations shaded by her emotions and feelings. She then proceeded to use those beliefs and perceptions to justified her criticisms for others not seeing things as she sees them through her emotion and feeling shaded perceptions. That is not truth at all, it is simply just part of the illusion we are in by being incarnate in this particular 3rd density environment. It merely another aspect that is part of the lessons we are to learn–there is truly nothing here that is truth and that it is coming to know, understand and become master of our emotions.

The basic point that I’m making is that when you are in 3rd density here on this planet you don’t deal with REAL TRUTH but instead deal with perceptions, beliefs, and opinions.

It’s simply the way life is here to provide us with the opportunity to realize that nothing we deal with on this planet is permanent, Everything is impermanent and transistory. Whether we deal with the illusion of freedom, wealth, government systems, or anything else they are all subject to change.

I will leave you with a final thought. Remember! Only the Universal Constant in this Universe is CHANGE!