Gold, Gold, Where’s the Gold?

It seems that there are still those who are supporting the illusion of the Global Accounts as being some kind of great savior or another.  However, the question that begs to be discussed is whether there is any reasonable justification in believing that at some point there will be some means by which to make available the gold that’s represented by the Global Collateral Accounts for the use of the world’s people.

People swear that the bonds that supposedly were issued in exchange for gold are valid and that others have seen bunkers full of gold.   I don’t disbelieve any of these statements what I find hard to believe is that based on the available facts there will ever be a way to recover the amounts of gold that is represented by the Global Collateral Accounts.

First, let’s take a look at where the world’s gold is to be found and how much gold are we really talking about.   According to an estimate based on all available information in 2011, 49.2% of the world’s gold was in jewelry, 19.26% was in investment form (bars, coins, etc.), 17.2% was held by all of the world’s central banks and governments, 12.14% was in use for industrial purposes, and 2.2% was unaccounted for (probably on the bottom of the ocean).

The estimated amount of total gold ever mined on this planet is approximately 171,300 metric tonnes and at a value at $1500 per troy ounce that gives you a total value of about $8.2 trillion.   Now with the distribution breakdown that was given above the value of the amount of gold held by all of the central banks and governments is only about $1.41 trillion dollars. [A little side note; that puts roughly about $4.0 trillion in jewelry, hence, the reason so many people are willing to buy your old gold jewelry]

The U.S. according to the U.S. Treasury at the end of September 2014 had about 8,133 metric tonnes of gold with a value of just over $11 billion.   I question the 8,133 number as the export/import figures for the amounts of gold going into and out of the U.S. from 1991 to 2011 shows that we shipped over 5,000 tonnes more gold out of the country than we imported.   That raises the question as to where did the gold come from to send that much out of the country?

According to numbers I saw tossed around about how much would be owed to the holders of those notes that were issued in exchange for the gold represented by the Global Accounts I heard numbers in the trillions of dollars.   If they are expecting payment in gold then the U.S. doesn’t even claim to have enough to do that with and knowing how much we have been shipping out without offsetting shipments in I would guess that they are definitely a lot shorter than that.

Even if the numbers used to estimate the total amount of gold on the planet is low they are not going to be that far off.   Gold isn’t that plentiful on this planet, that’s why it is so valuable to begin with and has been chased after since man first discovered it.

I don’t doubt that people have seen bunkers with gold in them.  Marcos while he was in control of the Philippines required that all gold sold there had to be sold to the government.   He supposedly then routed all that gold into bunkers that he had built underneath all of the palaces that he lived in.  I’m sure that people actually visited those bunkers and saw lots of gold stacked in them but that is not going to help the situation with the Global Accounts.  It doesn’t take a lot of gold to look like an enormous amount, it’s rather bulky.

The question then is how do you know that the U.S. government even has any gold to pay someone off with?   If there is no gold to use to pay off the debt even to the tune of the original amount what are they going to do, accept dollars?

Not only do I have a problem believing that there is enough gold in the coffers of the U.S. to pay off this debt but I also have a problem with the notion that you could find a U.S. judge that would entertain allowing a lawsuit that could devastate the U.S. economy.

I have the same attitude toward this as I do toward those protesters who believe that the Internal Revenue Code is illegal and that a Federal judge would ever rule in such a way as to declare it null and void.  I simply ask the tax protester if they really think that a judge would intentionally put themselves in the history books as being the one person who singlehandedly brought the entire U.S. economy to a crash.  After a bit of thought they usually see the rational point that regardless of whether the law is right or wrong no judge is going to do something so stupid.

Imagine if you will a lawsuit coming before a Federal judge involving the issue of the Global Accounts.   If I was a judge my first move would be exactly what the judge in the original case did.  I would set the stage for a dismissal based on lack of jurisdiction.  You’ve got a case that when you get down to the base elements is between foreign nationals and the U.S. government.

Here’s the problem with that case; U.S. case law establish sovereignty against a suit being brought against the government unless you have the government’s permission to sue them.   Not much chance that you’ll ever get that permission.

Then if all else fails, the fact that there are no Treasury records that even shows that notes in the denominations depicted have ever been printed by the Treasury is prima facie evidence that the notes produced are fakes.   No way that there isn’t enough reasons that a Federal judge can find that will guarantee that the outcome of the case will be any thing other than in favor of preventing harm to American citizens.

So real, fake doesn’t matter the outcome is going to always be the same.

Commentary On David Wilcock’s Additional November 12, 2014 Post-“Things Are Ramping Up….”

{A copy of David’s November 12 additional post entitled “Things Are Ramping Up VERY Quickly.. We Are Going To See Major People Getting Knocked Off” can be found here:}

In David’s comments he talks about lots of new people are coming forward.   I would assume that from his comments he has been talking with these people.   My concern would be that if they are just now coming on the scene I would take anything they had to say under advisement until the new comers could be properly vetted.   I would at least preface anything received from them or corroborated by them with disclaimers.

He talks about an Alliance that will “get the planet back” through “behind-the-scenes” efforts at least for some period of time to come.   I would love to accept this on face value but I know that to try to keep an organization that supposedly is global in scale and set on the destruction of those who have an agenda secret from the very same elitist power seekers would be almost impossible.

Reality check!  If the elitist have infiltrated governments as much as I know they have then all the resources of those governments would be at the disposal of the power seekers and anything remotely related to a viable organized resistance to their goals would be summarily dealt with.   If they have been manipulating and controlling events for hundreds if not thousands of years without being exposed then they know not only how to protect and cloak themselves but to efficiently eliminate any threats to their existence without exposure as well.

To protect and hide anyone who would oppose them with any type of success would take the resources of a major government such as the United States.  If virtually all the major governments in the world has been compromised by the elitist such a safe harbor isn’t likely to exist.

More over David talks about how their actions would result in us seeing “major people getting knocked off and it will be made to look like accidents”.  Let me tell you from experience that if you are working on a project such as he eluded to the last thing you would do would be to give any information to anyone that would see that information published on the internet in any shape or form.  Rationally, don’t you think that allowing such information to be published openly would jeopardize the mission by placing any targets on alert and place the mission members in unnecessary harm’s way by revealing the existence of the mission before you can even attempt to carry it out?

If this is how the Alliance works then I have low expectations for any success from them.  To pull off any type of covert action such as that described would require the highest levels of secrecy until after the fact.  Think the secrecy surrounding D-Day!

The resistance in German occupied countries in WWII were only as successful as was the secrecy of their existence and to the acts they pulled off before they occurred.   It would have been irrational for them to provide that they were going to blow up a train before they did it to someone who would publish their plans in the newspaper.  That’s pretty much what we see here with David’s commentary.

He talks about that the “most intriguing new tidbit was that it will reach a point where everybody knows about the Cabal”.  If you really want that to happen then you need to devise a campaign similar to the one that sold the public on the greenhouse gas caused climate change.  You would have to present credible evidence of their existence and what they have done with at least some level of substantiation.  That would include naming names and showing their direct or indirect involvement in known events or happenings.

At least in the U.S., the media can’t truly be mandated to do anything as David implies that the media will be forced to tell the truth.   The only way that would be possible is if someone actually took control of the media outlets either by force, coercion, or otherwise and then it wouldn’t necessarily be the “truth and nothing but the truth” as it could easily be manipulated into being nothing more than propaganda for a new set of players.

David speaks to the issue of a “secret space program” and that disclosure of involvement with ETs will be part of this new effort to bring about changes.  I have no doubt that there has been contact with and knowledge of ETs by the government for some time.  Confirmation of that contact by the government or even proof of that contact by earth based humans may occur sometime soon or it may not.

However, I am firmly convinced there will be no confirmation by ETs themselves unless those ETs have agendas of their own that involve earth humans somehow.   The reason I say this is because I KNOW without any doubt that the two prime driving factors that all higher level spiritual beings adhere to in this universe is the directives not to violate free will in any way and to not bring any harm of any kind to anything in the universe.

Openly contacting the human population on this planet before we reach a high enough spiritual level would inflict both free will violation and bring harm to many people here by forced destruction of their belief systems resulting in emotional anguish and perhaps even physical harm.   That type of damage and harm would never be knowingly inflicted upon anyone or anything in this universe by the higher order entities within this universe.

David wraps up his comments with a quote about seeing the arrest and prosecution of top banksters, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and anyone who has been violating the law.  I ask you to consider that if the elitist have infiltrated the government, judicial system, health system, educational system, etc., by direct or indirect means and influence; who is going to arrest them, who is going to prosecute them, and what judicial system is going to try them?

I do accept the allegation that there are wealthy individuals who firmly believe that the best future for this planet is for them to have the entire world under their total absolute control.   I accept that they believe that they and they alone know the best way to handle the over-population problem that faces this planet.   I accept that the wealthiest of the wealthy have manipulated control of most of the major vital corporations of the world for themselves.  I accept the fact that they have leveraged their control through the creation and formation of organizations like Bilderberg, Bohemian Grove, and others.  I accept the fact that the elitist power seekers have little or no respect for the great “unwashed” and believe that domination of us by them is justified and ordained.

By acceptance of these things, I know that the “arrest and prosecution” of their top echelon minions will not be easily done in the U.S. as the judges that have been confirmed to the Federal judiciary have been most often perverted to the will of the elite or at the very least tending toward being fully indoctrinated by the elitist built educational system into thinking in manner.  The arrest of these individuals will in time come to past but it will take time much time before the average person comes on line with the knowledge to understand the need for these things to be done.

Comments on David Wilcock’s November 12, 2014 Commentary

{If you haven’t read David’s comments you can find a copy here:}

I have a lot of respect for David’s ability to do research and to organize that research into a marketable book, however, there are things about David’s outlook on matters that I do take exception with.

I agree with David that there is no real political choice left in the U.S. as both parties are so controlled by elitist that voting for one is the same as voting for another.   I do, however, think David does those that follow him an injustice by trying to place blame on one party or one group of politically oriented people to the exclusion of the evidence.

His misconception that the “government shutdown” was harmful misses the mark! First, pretenses must be maintained of an illusion of choice for the masses so “conflict” between the parties must be maintained.   That illusion falls apart if you simply ask hard questions about why neither party presses the advantage when things are so blatantly out of whack.  Secondly, the so-called “government shutdown” brought harm to absolutely no one.   Government workers were impacted by having to stay home and not go to work but were paid for those days off after the “settlement” so they weren’t harmed.  Checks were distributed to those who receive disbursements from the government rendering no harm there as well.   So I have to ask, “David, where is the harm that you so casually talk about”?

Furthermore, your constant referral to Neocon’s is misleading in that conservatives aren’t the only ones at issue here.  The only factor about conservatives is that they may represent a political belief system different than your own but are neither right or wrong, good or bad.

Instead of some politically depraved people being even a contributing factor, what I see is a global elite that would like to control everything about the U.S. including all aspects of our “way of life”.   I note that those that belong to that elite come from all walks of life and it would appear as if they can be found across the political spectrum.   These elites have embedded themselves in the parties representing both sides and/or have managed to take control or manipulate enough politicians to control both major political parties.

When I look at the elites I see a lot of familiar names; on the “conservative” side I see Bush, Hunt, and others and names like Gates, Soros, Clinton, and others on the “liberal” side.   What they all share are groups like Bilderberger and Bohemian Grove.   Attendees at functions of these groups are often the very same people whether considered left or right and are without regard to political affiliation except for their belief that they should be “running the world”.

So why don’t we just stop trying to use name calling and simply face the fact that it is the masses against those that believe they are “the powers that should decide everything”.   It doesn’t matter who is in control of the government the end result is going to always be what is in the best interests of TPTB until the American people decide to make it different than that.

As for the Rochefeller/Israeli faction being represented by either party, may I ask, when was the last time that Congress controlled by either party went against the interests of that faction?   As far as I know they haven’t since Israel was created from Palestine by the UN after WWII.   I don’t see where trying to create a division between those that are being unjustly treated accomplishes anything.

David, you are correct in that those that voted for something different did so for entirely different reasons. They voted that way due mostly to disgust with the conditions that they find themselves in.   The long term unemployed stands at over 3 million Americans and you would be hard pressed to find someone who doesn’t know or has someone close to them that is in that group.

Most are tired of the constant struggle to make ends meet since the rate of inflation since Obama has been in office is at 12% while the wage earner’s real weekly earnings are only up 0.3%.   Food stamp recipients are up 44% which speaks to the dropping level of household incomes that is effecting most Americans.

Although unemployment numbers are given at around 6% that doesn’t take into consideration those that were dropped from the count simply because they are considered to no longer be looking for work.  Additionally, Americans live in stress of losing the jobs they have because if, god forbid, they do the average length of unemployment is still nearly 9 months before you can find a new job.   The jobs that people finally got as the “new” jobs were created weren’t in the higher hourly wage jobs they lost but in lower hourly wage jobs that were created.

Take a look at home ownership; the number of people who own their homes today is 20% less than it was in 2008 with the prospect of home ownership growing more remote all the time.   Don’t you think that also has something to do with the dissatisfaction?

You are right they are no longer buying the lie that things are better and are getting better because the people know it isn’t.   So yeah, what they voted for what may not turn out to be any better but they are hoping that at least a message is being sent to the Republicans as well as to the Democrats that lack of consideration of the needs of the people will not be tolerated.

Simply because the electorate decided to seek change doesn’t equate to any kind of “last chance” for the Republicans!   Just as the Democrats have done since 2008, they will continue to support the policies and attitudes that benefit TPTB.  The population will look and hope for an alternative but unless some independent person who can lead appears from nowhere there will be a constant back and forth shifting until the government collapses or is taken over outright by the elite.   If it collapses whether forced by economic conditions or by other means what will rise from the ashes, if the people aren’t careful, will be a totalitarian dictatorship which will give TPTB exactly what it is waiting for.  Once that happens it will be much harder to displace them but not impossible.

If Putin and the Chinese dumps their holdings of U.S. T-Notes all at once they just might shoot themselves in the foot.   Such a move could cause a sufficient backlash in the global markets that it would cause a devaluing of their own currencies to the point of causing harm to their own people.   Yet on the other hand that might not be such a bad thing.   If conditions around the world got bad enough maybe there would be enough of a “hitting the bottom” that the entire planet could come out of it creating a better place entirely.  But on the other hand that just might be the opening that the elite needs to take over world domination.

You speak of countries printing new currencies but what value would it have beyond what the current currency has?   Simply printing money doesn’t give it value.  What gives it value is the productivity of the people that use that currency and what others are wiling to trade for that currency.  If the world economy is forced to collapse who would buy what is produced?  If a country produces a new currency what incentive would there be for any other country to accept the new currency?  What you are taking about isn’t simply replacing currency but the creation of a new economic system.

[I see David has added some additional comments and I’ll comment on those tomorrow.]

NESARA, Global Accounts, Rapture, ETs; Who or What is going to save YOU?

Wouldn’t it be just grand if we didn’t need to do anything for ourselves and someone else would come along, bail us out of the mess we’ve created, make us instantly wealthy, and bring on the new age without us lifting a finger?

Now everyone who is convinced that any of this is really going to happen move to the left side of the room.   The rest of us needs to move over to the right side of the room so we can have a little conversation about reality.

As I talk about in the pages associated with this blog, I’m pretty much weird and have a different type of philosophical and political viewpoint.   Because of those two factors, plus others, I often sit back take things in and then just mull them over.   Such has been the case with all of the feel good, I don’t have to do anything solutions to the current conditions we find ourselves in.

Anyone who truly believes that ETs will come in to release us from the influence of TPTB [The Powers That Be] or some miracle act will relieve us of the ongoing exercise of survival will badly misinformed should consider a reality check.

What is it going to take to get people to readily see that nothing changes in their personal lives until they take responsibility for it and make change happen?  Just as that is the reality as to our personal lives it is also the reality in our homes, communities, states or provinces, nations and planet as a whole.

Changes happen in our relationships and homes only after we start to change the way we are.   Once we understand that it is not what the other person does that creates the problem but how we react and what we do that is at issue.   It’s not that a husband leaves his socks on the bedroom floor but how we react to the socks being on the floor of the bedroom that contributes to the problem.

If we react by getting angry and yelling about them leaving their socks lying around what do we expect but an angry confrontation in return.   We should try to look at why do we react in such an extreme manner to find out what truly is the issue that lies hidden underneath.   By changing how we perceive the events in our lives and what constitutes right and wrong reaction does our energies begin to effect others into making changes themselves.

Thus by each of us making individual changes does the social memory complex fabric begin to change in such a manner that the actions of the individuals are molded into a more cohesive harmony.  Only by changing the “moral” standards which we dictate to be acceptable behavior will we get the world to change.

“To put the world in order, we must first put the nation in order; to put the nation in order, we must first put the family in order; to put the family in order; we must first cultivate our personal life; we must first set our hearts right.”